Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

first step to fix dvd-dev/hilo#486 by making room to a second websock… #505

Draft
wants to merge 6 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Leicas
Copy link

@Leicas Leicas commented Nov 26, 2024

…et handling challenge events.

@Leicas Leicas marked this pull request as draft November 26, 2024 03:36
Copy link

@gitpack-ai gitpack-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review for this PR

The changes introduce handling for multiple websockets, which is an ambitious and complex feature. While the code attempts to manage connections and reconnections efficiently, there is an increase in complexity due to the use of lists to track multiple tasks. Redundancies in methods and potential maintainability issues are worth addressing for improved robustness.

Positives:

  • The handling of websockets seems more robust, aiming to support multiple connections which is a forward-looking enhancement.
  • The use of detailed logging will help in debugging and monitoring websocket status, which is a good practice.

Areas of Improvement:

  • Consolidate similar methods to reduce redundancy and improve maintainability.
  • Enhance comments and documentation around websocket management logic, specifically the reasoning behind list usage for managing tasks.

Comment on lines +235 to +236
self._websocket_reconnect_tasks: list[asyncio.Task | None] = [None, None]
self._update_task: list[asyncio.Task | None] = [None, None]
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Switching from a single asyncio.Task to a list for both _websocket_reconnect_tasks and _update_task introduces complexity, which could require additional management logic to handle these lists properly and ensure synchronization. Consider commenting the rationale behind using lists here or ensuring robust handling to avoid potential issues.

Comment on lines 366 to 367
async def request_status_update_challenge(self) -> None:
await self._api.websocket2.send_status()
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The addition of request_status_update_challenge seems redundant given its similarity to request_status_update. Consider refactoring these methods to reduce code duplication, which will improve maintainability in case of future changes.

@ic-dev21
Copy link
Collaborator

ic-dev21 commented Nov 26, 2024

Will depend on dvd-dev/python-hilo#224

Clarifié fonction des 2 websockets avec leur noms
Ça permet les deux connexions maintenant, sans erreur
Copy link

@gitpack-ai gitpack-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review for this PR

The refactoring effort to split websockets into device-specific and challenge-specific areas is a sensible approach to managing complexity and decoupling code. The overall structure and flow have been maintained well, while additional subscription functions have been appropriately modularized. However, careful consideration should be given to maintainability and robustness, especially around areas like task management and failure handling.

Positives:

  • The addition of new callback methods improves code modularity, making it easier to extend or maintain.
  • The separation of websocket responsibilities demonstrates a good practice for handling multiple connection needs.

Areas of Improvement:

  • Consider using a more descriptive data structure instead of list indexing for managing multiple tasks associated with websockets.
  • Enhance error handling, particularly around token refresh operations, to add robustness and mitigate potential failure points.

Comment on lines +235 to +236
self._websocket_reconnect_tasks: list[asyncio.Task | None] = [None, None]
self._update_task: list[asyncio.Task | None] = [None, None]
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The conversion from a single asyncio.Task to a list does increase flexibility, but ideally, you should use a more descriptive data structure (like a dictionary) here if the tasks have different responsibilities. Using indexes may lead to maintenance challenges.

Comment on lines +385 to +386
for inv_id, inv_cb in self.invocations.items():
await inv_cb(inv_id)
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Iterating over self.invocations in this manner could be resource-intensive depending on the size and nature of the invocations. Consider the potential latency or blocking behavior of each callback invoked.

self.start_websocket_loop(self._api.websocket_devices, 0)
)
self._websocket_reconnect_tasks[1] = asyncio.create_task(
self.start_websocket_loop(self._api.websocket_challenges, 1)
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Refreshing the websocket token might require additional error handling if it fails. Consider wrapping this with a try-except block to prevent cascading errors.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants